UK passed paternity fraud laws in 1834, why can’t PA, TX, NY, MI, CA, NC and …

 

No one should be surprised at our quest to establish truth-in-paternity as the best interest for all kids whenever a male is alleged as the biological father.

It is utterly amazing that many states actively support paternity fraud against their male citizens while claiming to support the United States Constitution. Have you ever heard of involuntary servitude being declared illegal?

Read more information about state supported paternity fraud

 

See the proposed Pennsylvania paternity fraud bill HB 1140 for the 2009-2010 session. Be careful, it does not free marital paternity fraud victims unless the victim is successful in challenging paternity before the child’s fifth birthday.

There is no requirement for the one person that knows the true list of paternity candidates to declare the facts under oath before the fifth birthday. 

URL: http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&sessYr=2009&sessInd=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billnbr=1140&pn=1352

 

Experiences of paternity fraud dramatically influenced England’s “New Poor Law” of 1834:

- From The Finer Report [3]:

“Behind this extreme statement of the providential foundations of the double standard of sexual morality lay the experience of abuses under the old bastardy laws. Under these, if a single woman declared herself pregnant and charged a man with being responsible, the overseers of the poor or any substantial householder could apply to any justice of the peace for a committal warrant…. The Commissioners thought that poor men were at the mercy of blackmail and perjury by unscrupulous women…. The bastardy clauses of the Act of 1834 were in line with the opinions of the Poor Law Commissioners. The laws which had enabled a mother to charge a putative father before the magistrates were repealed”.

Can you say “we need DNA testing at birth and the initial child support proceeding to prevent paternity fraud”. An ounce of preventive legal DNA paternity beats 18 – 21 years of wrongful child support, litigation expenses and court fees.

Some of my clients tested the infant, toddler and teenagers and discovered “He is NOT the father”. Truth is a good thing … don’t you think?

Carnell Smith PfV

Carnell Smith PfV

 

Resource: http://www.childsupportanalysis.co.uk/analysis_and_opinion/choices_and_behaviours/paternity_fraud.htm

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Blogosphere News
  • De.lirio.us
  • Faves
  • Furl

No Comments

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.